Case Study
Cleaning on Demand in a Gypsum Plant
â–º Compressed Air Wastage: Continuous cleaning consumed excessive compressed air, a major operational expense.
â–º Component Wear & Tear: Constant pulsing accelerated the wear on diaphragms and increased the likelihood of contaminants like oil, dirt, or water entering the compressed air lines.
â–º Filter Bag Degradation: Over-cleaning weakened the filter bags prematurely due to repeated flexing and stress.
The training introduced the plant operators to the benefits of cleaning on demand—a method where cleaning is triggered only when differential pressure reaches a set threshold. This approach optimizes cleaning frequency and addresses the problems caused by continuous cleaning.
The plant decided to implement cleaning on demand across their systems and sought assistance to retrofit their equipment. The solution involved:
â–º Installing Timer Boards: Updated systems to enable demand-based cleaning.
â–º Adding Photohelic Gauges: These allowed precise monitoring and control of differential pressure to trigger cleaning cycles effectively.
â–º Technical Support: Guidance and training on implementing the new cleaning strategy.
Outcome
After implementing cleaning on demand, the gypsum plant saw:
â–º Cost Savings: A significant reduction in compressed air usage, leading to lower operating costs.
â–º Extended Equipment Life: Reduced wear on diaphragms and filter bags.
â–º Environmental Incentive: The plant secured state funding for the upgrade due to the operational improvements and energy savings.
Key Takeaway